Stream It Or Skip It: ‘Diorama’ on Netflix, a Swedish Dramedy About the Folly of Human Monogamy Now it just seems a bit generic and homogenous, like there isn't a central tastemaker or arbiter of what is good and bad.'Cobra Kai's Sexiest Moment Perfectly Parodies 'Top Gun' You used to hear about Steve Jobs liking certain design or tech and pushing it, etc.
#Gawker apple software
So when I said I was pleasantly surprised to hear he was involved in television marketing and wish he were in software, I kind of meant in the sense that I have not really heard of him being involved in any software technology or ever really speak to it beyond the general marketing. When the M1 Macs and Big Sur were released, there were a lot of YouTube interviews with lower level Apple execs, which is kind of unusual for Apple, but they all sounded exactly like Tim Cook: like people reading the same information that's on and like mindless drones, and it was kind of sad and second hand embarrassing (YouTube interviewer: "Am I crazy, or is Big Sur really great?" Apple Exec: "Actually, you're not crazy! You know, you're really perceptive because we set out to make Big Sur really great and we're so happy that it is and that you noticed.") It doesn't seem like there's anyone like him at the company now. Steve Jobs maybe was unique in that he was very hands on in specific areas and left a lot of operations to others. I've never heard him speak to specific software issues or technologies the way that Steve Jobs did. At no point did Tim Cook apparently notice that.
#Gawker apple free
Yes yes, you live in a free country with free speech, on the condition that you don't talk about certain topics.Ĭlick to expand.Yeah, I can see how it's not a day to day decision.īut as a counterexample, when Apple Maps debuted, it was after many months of beta testing in which it was clearly not ready. Sound familiar? Mind your own business, keep working and buying the expensive products and don't ask too many questions. So no one will really hear about the concentration camps because it's not in anyone's interest to talk about it. China will not hesitate to ban anything, and that's a whole lot of money lost if it happens. So why not just make your documentary elsewhere? Well eventually everyone will depend on China and no one will want to take the risk.
Art is more than that, it has a purpose, and people are actively working on taking that purpose away and dumbing it down so people stay stupid.ĭon't think about China. That's not what films are for, it's just what they have become. The kinds of stuff you'd watch to chill after a long day of work. Chinese censorship has successfully bled into the "free world" through Apple.Īpple wants you to just keep producing mind-numbing, entertaining, boredom-fighting films, as long as it doesn't question the world we live in, as long as it isn't actually informative and upsetting. So get this: an American can't make an American documentary criticizing China, for an American audience, if Apple is the producer. You're not just censuring it in China (like YouTube or Facebook), you're censuring it everywhere, for everyone. And what is your first rule about that? No China. But now you've gotten involved in film production, which is a powerful art form that can help change the world, get information out to people in ways that no other medium can. Yeah yeah, whatever, you just make electronics, whatever. There's a point where you can say "yeah but I don't want to get involved in the politics of another country". If Russia was their manufacturing partner, Apple would be as anti-gay as it can be. Not because they believe in it, but because it benefits them financially.
#Gawker apple pro
Apple's main customers are young, modern-thinking open-minded people who are in majority pro LGBT, no wonder Apple is openly supporting gay rights.
But when it doesn't, you do the opposite. Because when it happens to benefit YOU financially, you say the right things. To say that you're a pro human rights, pro-environment, modern-thinking company to show that you stand on the good side of the ethical scale, while openly participating in the censorship of genocide by an all-powerful communist dictatorship is just totally hypocritical. But that doesn't mean it shouldn't upset you to your core. I'm sure Hitler would not have allowed documentaries about concentration camps either, it makes perfect sense. I mean of course, it makes sense that China would be upset if Apple did that. So if someone wants to make a documentary about concentration camps in China, Apple won't allow it because it has to lick China's butt.
0 kommentar(er)
